April 30, 2007
Four years ago on May 1 was when
Georgie President Bush played dress-up and landed on a giant ship in the middle of the ocean right near San Diego. The banner behind him read “Mission Accomplished” and he said this:
My fellow Americans: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. (Applause.) And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country. In this battle, we have fought for the cause of liberty, and for the peace of the world.
So the question is, what exactly was the mission? And did they accomplish it?
If it was to topple the government and
grab secure the oil, then yes. If it was to topple Saddam, yes. If it was to give billions of dollars in contracts to their corporate friends, yes. Congratulations on a job well done!!! YEAY!!! (Now, why are you still there?)
But, if the purpose was to find WMD’s, then no, they didn’t accomplish the mission. If it was to bring democracy to the middle east, no. If it was to make the world safer, no. If it was to find Al Qaeda, no. (They weren’t there then.) If the mission was to fight terrorism, no. To punish Saddam for 9-11 (which he had nothing to do with), also no.
So should I congratulate Bush or ask him to re-define the mission? Or just ask him to get our troops out of Iraq?
April 29, 2007
Every once in a while you hear these studies about how little Americans know about geography. I have always been pretty good at that and I like studying about other places even though I have never yet left Texas. Saw this map the other day and started to wonder if this really IS how Americans see the world. If so, we should all be really worried!
(Can’t wait to see what my World Geog teacher thinks of it!)
April 29, 2007
There is not enough in the media about the soldiers who died in our war of choice and occupation of Iraq. This tells the story of one of those soldiers in the voice of his wife and his little girl. It might make you cry, but that is a good thing. We need to cry about what is happening here.
Like most of my political posts, this is cross-posted at Political Teen Tidbits and at YouThinkLeft.
April 28, 2007
Have you seen this in the American press? The world certainly notices the effects of our government’s policy. Do we?
MOSCOW. April 28 (Interfax) – About 1,000 activists of Russian youth organizations have donated blood in an action being held in front of the U.S. embassy in Moscow on Saturday.
“This blood will be used to form a donor bank for the victims of American aggression,” Anastasiya Suslova, the press secretary of the Nashi movement, told Interfax. The purpose of the action “is to draw the attention of the U.S. State Department and the U.S embassy to consequences of their orders,” she said. The blood donated by young Russians is also intended for those” who will yet suffer from the American struggle for lofty ideals,” she added. The action, in the estimate of law enforcement agencies, involves over 1,000 activists of the Nashi, Young Russia and Mestnye (Locals)youth movements. The U.S. embassy is being guarded by reinforced police squads and riot police. The demonstrators’ conduct is absolutely proper, polices aid.
April 26, 2007
The Republican Party plays dirty when it comes to elections. In 2000, they STOPPED the Florida vote count and have been disenfranchising black voters for years in many places. Bobby Kennedy Jr has had two important articles recently about election fraud. (Will The Next Election Be Hacked and Was the 2004 Election Stolen?”) Now there is a new article in the Free Press that talks about four different ways that the election might have been stolen. In the article, Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman connect the 5 million missing RNC emails to the election results and talk about the RNC email servers and the official Ohio election servers being housed in the same place and run by the same company.Here are some of the interesting things in the article itself:
E-mails being sought from Karl Rove’s computers, and recent revelations about critical electronic conflicts of interest, may be the smoking guns of Ohio’s stolen 2004 election. A thorough recount of ballots and electronic files. preserved by a federal lawsuit, could tell the tale.
But two felony convictions have thus far resulted from what prosecutors have called the “rigging” of the recount in Cuyahoga County (where Bennett has been forced to resign his chairmanship of the board of elections). More are likely to follow.
The practices that led to these convictions were apparently repeated in many of Ohio’s 88 counties. The order to violate the law—or at least tacit approval to do so—is almost certain to have come from Blackwell.
Please this article in the Free Press for more information.
April 25, 2007
Posted by Cassie Frequelz under anti-war
, Bill Moyers
, current events
, White House
For the first time since I watched Sesame Street regularly, I watched a PBS show for an hour and a half tonight and it was really wonderful. The show is BUYING THE WAR: and you can click the link to watch it, read the transcript, or comment on it.
According to PBS,
“Buying the War” examines the press coverage in the lead-up to the war as evidence of a paradigm shift in the role of journalists in democracy and asks, four years after the invasion, what’s changed? “More and morethe media become, I think, common carriers of administration statements and critics of the administration,” says THE WASHINGTON POST’s Walter Pincus. “We’ve sort of given up being independent on our own.”
I watched this while blogging with a group of adults who were also watching, and we all agreed that it was a great explanation of how the press didn’t do its job in questioning the reasons for the Iraq war, the intelligence about the Iraq war, or even the existence of protests against the war.
Knut Wicksell, one of the people I was blogging with said this:
“Bill Moyers is doing a great service to this nation by pointing out (a) that the war was sold by Goebbels-like propaganda, and (b) that the majority of the public were against it until they were subjected to it, and (c) that a large number of us demonstrated against it, but the press refused to cover.
“This war is a moral as well as a strategic catastrophe. We are unable to undo the strategic catastrophe and will simply have to live with the fact, with all its implications, which are many. But the moral ones can be saved just a little by the fact that many of us resisted. And Moyers is testifying to that resistance.”
I agree completely. Please go check out this great TV program.
Like most of my posts, this is cross-posted at Political Teen Tidbits and at YouThinkLeft.
April 23, 2007
Posted by Cassie Frequelz under Blogroll
Read this diagnosis and see if you can figure out what the mental illness is. Also, does this remind you of anyone in public office in the United States?
At least five of the following are necessary for a diagnosis (as with many DSM diagnoses, they must form a pervasive pattern; for example, a person who shows these criteria only in one or two relationships or situations would not properly be diagnosed with NPD):
- has a grandiose sense of self-importance
- is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
- believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by other special people
- requires excessive admiration
- strong sense of entitlement
- takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
- lacks empathy
- is often envious or believes others are envious of him or her
- arrogant affect.
The diagnosis is for Narcissistic Personaility Disorder and is from Wikipedia.
Who did you guess? Leave an answer in the comment section.
Next Page »