Sunday, April 8th, 2007


Vocabulary

 

At my school, the teachers post a new vocabulary list, complete with
definitions, on their doors and walls every week. Somehow this is
supposed to make us learn how to use and understand these words well
enough to pass the TAKS test. OK. Forget the TAKS test. These are the
words we need to learn in order to survive the bush years:

Corporate Personhood: the legal fiction used within United States law that a corporation has a
limited number or subset of the same constitutional rights as does a human being. The choice of the word “person” in “personhood” arises from the way the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was worded and from earlier legal usage of the word “person.”

Cronyism: partiality to cronies especially as evidenced in the appointment of political hangers-on to office without regard to their qualifications

Delusion: 1 : the act of deluding : the state of being deluded  2 a : something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated b : a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or
objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary; also : the abnormal state marked by such beliefs

Double Standard: a set of principles that applies differently and usually more rigorously to one group of people or circumstances than to another

Fanaticism: fanatic outlook or behavior

Hypocrisy 1 : a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not; especially : the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion 2 : an act or instance of hypocrisy

Impeachment 1 a : to bring an accusation against b : to charge with a crime or misdemeanor; specifically : to charge (a public official) before a competent tribunal with misconduct in office c : to remove from office especially for misconduct 2 : to cast doubt on; especially : to challenge the credibility or validity of <impeach the testimony of a witness>

Recess Appointment: A recess appointment occurs when the President of the United States fills a vacant Federal position during a recess of the United States Senate. The commission or appointment must be approved by the Senate by the end of the next session, or the position becomes vacant again. Recess appointments are authorized by Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution:
“The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”
(From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recess_appointment)

Scandal 1 a : discredit brought upon religion by unseemly conduct in a religious person b : conduct that causes or encourages a lapse of faith or of religious obedience in another 2 : loss of or damage to reputation caused by actual or apparent violation of morality or propriety : DISGRACE 3 a : a circumstance or action that offends propriety or established moral conceptions or disgraces those associated with it b : a person whose conduct offends propriety or morality <a scandal to the profession

 

Any other words or phrases we need to learn in order to survive these years?

Like most of my posts, this is cross-posted at Political Teen Tidbits and at YouThinkLeft.

White House Iraq War vocabulary

From: www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/cat_media.htm

All little kids know what the word “fair” means. And they especially know when someone is not treating them fairly. Even when we are very young, children expect that teachers and parents should treat us fairly but then we learn that adults sometimes use a “double standard” to get away with being unfair. A double standard is defined by World Book as: “a standard applied more leniently to one group than to another”.
In the United States, the press is supposed to be fair. In fact, we used to have the fairness doctrine that ensured that the press was balanced and didn’t apply a double standard. That law is now gone, but even so, while we now expect Fox News to be biased, we should still insist that the mainstream press at least try to be fair.
ThinkProgress has a post about the right wing media smearing Pelosi for wearing a scarf while visiting a tomb in Syria. The mainstream media has ignored that fact that many other prominent U.S. women (republicans and democrats) have done the same to respect the customs of the countries they were visiting. This is important, but I think it is more important to look at what the administration officials said, and what mainstream media reported, and to talk about the substance of her visit and not just the scarf. The media only wants a controversy for their ratings, and have stopped caring about presenting the real news. They report administration lies and distortions without correcting them, and wait for a good ‘ratings producing’ fight between the left and the right, when they bring the pundits on camera for their shouting matched. This is not news! It is media irresponsibility hiding behind false neutrality and the pretense of fairness.

image013.jpgimage014.jpg

 

 

 

These examples of the double standard applied by the White House and the mainstream media are far more important to look at because they focus more on the substance of what Pelosi was doing in Syria and less on her scarf:

Republican Delegation Currently Visiting Syria, Spared From White House Attacks

NANCY PELOSI GOES TO SYRIA. WINGNUTS GO INTO ORBIT


And, as Friday’s New York Times pointed out,

The tone of the complaints — particularly Vice President Dick Cheney’s public characterization of her visit as “bad behavior” — contrasts sharply with the administration’s silence about a similar trip to Damascus a week ago by Republican lawmakers, Representatives Frank R. Wolf of Virginia, Joe Pitts of Pennsylvania and Robert B. Aderholt of Alabama.

Nor was there much heard from the White House about a meeting that Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican, had with Mr. Assad on Thursday, a day after Ms. Pelosi met with the Syrian president.

OK, maybe we don’t expect much better from Cheney, but what about CNN? Media Matters pointed out some double standards in CNN’s coverage, saying:

“On the April 2 edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN ran an on-screen graphic reading “Pelosi’s Bad Trip?” throughout a report about a congressional delegation visit to Syria led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). As Media Matters for America noted twice on April 2 (here and here), CNN aired reports about White House criticism of the Pelosi-led trip without mentioning the White House’s inconsistency in not also criticizing a Republican-led delegation that met with Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad in Damascus on April 1.”

Separately, Media Matters pointed to the Washington Post’s and CNN’s use of the term “pratfall in Damascus“. These are some CNN screenshots:

pelosi-damascus.png

Other blogs worth reading on this issue are:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-zogby/americans-should-defend-s_b_45221.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mj-rosenberg/blessed-are-the-peacemake_b_45183.html

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/06/putnams-speakerair-fiction-airbrushed-by-wapo/

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/05/duncan-sez/

 

Like most of my posts, this is cross-posted at Political Teen Tidbits and at YouThinkLeft.